April 10, 2017

LOSS OF TRUST AND CONFIDENCE MUST BE FOUNDED ON CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FACTS

Leo’s Restaurant and Bar Cafe, et al. Vs. Laarne C. Densing G.R. No. 208535. October 19, 2016 Facts: Kimwa Construction & Development Corporation employed Densing as […]
April 12, 2017

UNION OFFICERS WHO INDUCE MEMBERS NOT TO WORK OVERTIME (SLOWDOWN STRIKE) MAY BE DISMISSED FROM SERVICE

Ramirez vs. Polyson Industries, Inc. G.R. No. 207898, October 19, 2016 Facts: Respondents received a notice of hearing from the DOLE with respect to the petition […]
April 14, 2017

PRESCRIPTION TO FILE RETIREMENT CLAIM DOES NOT RUN IF EMPLOYEE IS ENGAGED EVEN AFTER REACHING COMPULSORY RETIREMENT AGE

De La Salle Araneta University vs. Juanito C. Bernardo G.R. No. 190809, February 13, 2017 Facts: Juanito Bernardo filed a complaint against DLS-AU for the payment […]
April 14, 2017

COMMISSIONS, TAX REBATES, or PROFIT SHARING GIVEN as FORMS OF ENCOURAGEMENT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF THE GENERAL TERM “COMMISSIONS” AND WAGES

Toyota Pasig, Inc. vs. De Peralta G.R. No. 213488. November 7, 2016 Facts: Toyota Pasig hired Peralta as a cashier initially. Eventually, she worked her way […]
April 16, 2017

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REGLEMENTARY PERIOD TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI IS 45 DAYS NOT 60 DAYS

Nueva Ecija II Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al. vs. Elmer B. Mapagu G.R. No. 196084, February 15, 2017 Facts: Respondent Elmer B. Mapagu (Mapagu) was employed […]
April 17, 2017

LOSS OF TRUST AND CONFIDENCE MUST BE FROM DISHONEST OR DECEITFUL CONDUCT

Julieta B. Sta. Ana vs. Manila Jockey Club, Inc. G.R. No. 208459, February 15, 2017 Facts: In May 1977, Manila Jockey Club, Inc. (MJCI) hired Julieta […]
April 18, 2017

REFUSAL OF EMPLOYEE TO REPORT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION IS DEEMED WAIVER OF RIGHT TO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND NOT INSUBORDINATION

Sta. Isabel vs. Perla Compañia De Seguros, Inc. G.R. No. 219430, November 7, 2016 Facts: Perla, a company engaged in insurance business, hired Sta. Isabel as […]
April 19, 2017

IN THE ABSENCE OF CONTRACT FOR PROJECT EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYEE IS PRESUMED REGULAR

Quebral, et al. vs. Angbus Construction, Inc. G.R. No. 221897, November 7, 2016 Facts: Petitioners Quebral, et al., alleged that Angbus employed them as construction workers […]
April 20, 2017

THE TERMINATION OF RELATIONSHIP “UPON COMPLETION OF THE PHASE OF WORK” OF A PROJECT EMPLOYEE IS DEFINITE AS THERE IS CERTAINTY OF COMPLETION

Ganzon, Inc. (EGI) vs. Fortunato B. Ando, Jr. G.R. No. 214183, February 20, 2017 Facts: Fortunato B. Ando, Jr. (Ando) filed a complaint against petitioner E. […]
error: Content is protected !!